2.0 Job Target range

Comments: 14

Oldest • Newest • Most likes • Fewest likes

• Add a comment
• 16 Sep, '24
  BV Merged

  Highlighted comment
  
  Add back 1/5 of sigma lines to the graphs in PI2. Particularly for teaching the workshop and teaching factor combos, having a way to measure with a high level of specificity is important.

  Copy link to this comment
• 21 Mar, '23
  Kaileen Merged

  Prospects are interested in being able to 'drag & drop' factors on a smaller level that matches some of the preset targets they see.
  Prospects are also interested in making some of the job target boxes wider than others to make a larger range

  Copy link to this comment
• 06 Feb, '24
  Michael Kirk

  Thgis is imporatnt to create a better flow and productivity when using the job target. Right now there are too many clicks...

  Copy link to this comment
• 03 Apr, '24
  Bill Barker

  When consulting with a client, it is common to refine the job target, especially when multiple individuals have completed the JA.

  Copy link to this comment
• 11 Apr, '24
  Beth Friel

  A job target is a 'best guess' that, by the nature of work, needs to be revisited at times. You may set one, especially for a new role, then find that top performers are different from the initial guess. The inability to refine or modify a target is a giant handicap.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 18 Jun, '24
  Lexie Jones

  Please add this flexibility back in

  Copy link to this comment
• 22 Jul, '24
  Tasia Allison

  plus add the flexibility to extend the width beyond one sigma

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 01 Oct, '24
  kathleen teehan

  A factor that has no correlation to performance should be expressed in the Job Target with a wider range. This indicates that a high or low expression of the factor can be effective in the role. Forcing the factor to be within on SD is not scientifically accurate.

  Copy link to this comment
• 11 Oct, '24
  Alex Tompkins System Merged

  "More customizable job target - Prospect Feedback" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2023-03-21), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 18 Nov, '24
  Kat Resker Admin

  Requested from upgraded client Hamed Tavakoli with Landers Investment LLC

  Copy link to this comment
• 19 Nov, '24
  Damon Clark Merged

  Particularly for clients with larger applicant volumes and narrow benchmarks, the job target can often capture a large volume of good-fit applicants. However, when analyzing the fit, candidates are not a close match to the target. Due to the volume of candidates, clients are often reliant on the number score. Using a 1/2 sigma target allows for a more accurate spread on the numbered results.

  Copy link to this comment
• 23 Dec, '24
  Megan Antonelli System

  "The ability to increase or reduce the job target sliders" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-11-19), including upvotes (2) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 23 Dec, '24
  Megan Antonelli System

  "Ability to set job target using 1/5 sigma lines" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-09-16), including upvotes (6) and comments (2), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 19 Feb, '25
  Alison Grizzle

  Wide patterns are getting too negatively impacted from score perspective. I have a 2 standard deviation high A and B and a 3 standard deviation low C.... When you can't intentionally extend the target to capture a wider pool, then wide patterns are always 3 stars, which is not representative of the pool.... So I have people overlooking wider captains and persuaders when they have a narrower captain pattern set. AND, there are even worse fits scoring higher bc they are closer to the set target, even though they are on the other side of the midpoint.

  Copy link to this comment